It has been reported that JD.com is strictly enforcing attendance, reducing the lunch break from two hours to one hour, and canceling the practice of turning off the lights during lunchtime. At the executive meeting held on the 24th, Liu Qiangdong, Chairman of the Board of JD Group, made an internal speech in response to this matter.

"“If we have a large number of brothers taking a long nap, and it is necessary to turn off the lights for two hours to take a long nap at noon, and still want the company's performance to be good, salaries to rise, and to realize our dreams, to make great achievements in this life, this is an impossible thing.”" said Liu Qiangdong.

Advertisement

"“In the future, as long as the performance is good, there will never be overtime; if the performance reaches the average level, as long as you strive, the company will never fire you; but for those who perform poorly and never strive, the company cannot tolerate any of them and will gradually eliminate them all through various means.”" Liu Qiangdong said firmly.

I believe that companies need to find a balance between employee welfare and corporate performance. Liu Qiangdong's response focuses on improving corporate efficiency to cope with the current competitive situation. However, there may be better ways to improve corporate benefits, and it is not advisable to completely cut off the two-hour nap.

For positions with high work intensity, it is necessary to continue maintaining a two-hour nap time. For relatively leisurely positions, it can be shortened to one hour or even the nap can be canceled. Now we can see that private enterprises will also have problems of low efficiency and even corruption after they grow in size. Corporate management should not only clean up these chaos but also maintain reasonable benefits for employees.

In summary, it is not wrong for companies to emphasize striving and progress, but they also need to pay attention to adopting appropriate management strategies, to improve work efficiency and protect the health of employees. This will be beneficial to the long-term development of the company.

Some fans and friends asked: Can stocks, futures, and spot transactions not stop loss? If you need to stop loss, how to thoroughly implement it?

It is necessary to stop loss. Because investment must protect the principal. Especially for futures and spot transactions, if you do not stop loss, you will eventually lose all the principal.

If you want to thoroughly implement the stop loss, the first step is to have a deep understanding of the investment. Once you have a deep understanding, it will naturally be easy to execute and you will know how to thoroughly implement it.

For example, if a stock falls, although its performance is still acceptable now, its fundamentals have actually deteriorated. If we do not understand the long-term prospects and valuation of the company behind the stock, we will be entangled in whether to stop loss now. Our subconscious may harbor a fluke and do not want to stop loss, want to wait and see. As a result, our losses become more severe after a few days or weeks.This is due to insufficient and shallow understanding, which makes it difficult for us to thoroughly implement stop-loss measures. If our understanding is sufficient, we will naturally not hesitate and will decisively take action to stop losses. The understanding in investment includes the cognition of market fluctuations, the cognition of companies and industries, and the cognition of one's own human weaknesses.

By improving these cognitions, we will naturally thoroughly implement stop-loss measures. For example, knowing that one's personality is more indecisive, one should set up investment warnings, stop-loss rules, and stop-loss prompts to urge oneself to strictly implement stop-loss. When I was young, my stop-loss was to set a timer, and as soon as the timer rang, I would immediately start to implement the stop-loss.

Because of insufficient investment cognition, the vast majority of people cannot do a good job in stop-loss. For ordinary people, it is best to invest in index funds, which can avoid the problem of insufficient understanding of the fundamentals of individual stocks and the inability to effectively implement stop-loss. Index funds generally do not need stop-loss, as long as the industry will still exist, we can buy more and more as the price falls, and ultimately achieve profits.

For example, if we cannot understand the fundamentals of pig farming companies, we give up investing in the stocks of pig farming companies, and we can invest in the livestock index fund. As long as people will still eat pork in the future and the pig farming industry still exists, we can continue to add positions to the livestock index fund at relatively low levels. Don't be afraid of the decline of the livestock index fund, because a company may not be able to turn around in adversity, but the overall industry will eventually emerge from the trough. This is also the reason why I am currently continuously adding positions to the photovoltaic index fund.